Legal Opinion
Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 10, 2015No. 2012-1170PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge REYNA.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY, with whom PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and DYK, Circuit Judges, join.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), declares certain acts unlawful. Among them is importing “articles that ... infringe a valid and enforceable United States patent.” 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(l)(B)(i). The International Trade Commission (“Commission”) interpreted this provision to cover importation of goods that,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Amanda Beck, a Minor, by Her Father, Henry J. Beck v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Balestra v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.