Legal Opinion
Baldwin v. Prince
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 26, 1979No. 78-246PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
Appellant, Jerry Baldwin, d/b/a Air Distribution Products, and John Prince, appellee, entered into a contract in August 1973 which was by its terms to continue for one year but renewal for an additional year upon mutual agreement. The contract was not renewed in 1974; however, the parties continued to work together and appellee was paid according to the terms of the contract. He was paid a commission on sales made by him. The parties agreed to form a corporation whereby appellant Baldwin would own 51% of the stock and appellee 49%. Appellant Baldwin then incorporated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edwin G. Richer, A/K/A E. G. Richer & Company v. Khoury Bros., Inc., and Henderson Quality Shops, Inc., Edwin G. Richer, A/K/A E. G. Richer & Company v. Khoury Bros., Inc., and Henderson Quality Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Northwest Auto Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
- Doss v. Long Prairie Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Powers & Co. v. American Society of Tool EngineersMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Neely v. WilmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vigoro Industries, Inc. v. CrispCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Vigoro Industries, Inc. v. Cleveland Chemical Co. of Arkansas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
- Vigoro Industries v. Cleveland ChemicalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Vigoro Indus. v. CLEVELAND CHEMICAL OF ARKANSASDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994