Legal Opinion
Vigoro Indus. v. CLEVELAND CHEMICAL OF ARKANSAS
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided November 4, 1994No. LR-C-93-672Published
1Opinion of the Court
866 F.Supp. 1150 (1994)
VIGORO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
CLEVELAND CHEMICAL COMPANY OF ARKANSAS, INC.; James M. Sanders; Michael W. Sanders; Kenneth Crisp; Margie L. Aaron; Elsie D. Bartlett; Larry B. Bearden; Dennis E. Cavette; David A. Puckett; Tommy R. Reeves; Louis Sain; Don Scarbrough, Jr.; Shedrick H. Smith, Jr.; Houston Snyder; Syd D. Snyder; and Donald R. Washburn, Defendants.
No. LR-C-93-672.
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.
November 4, 1994.
Amy Lee Stewart, Rose Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, Roger W. Wenthe, Byron L. Gregory, McDermott, Will & Emery,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- ILG Industries, Inc. v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- AMP Inc. v. FleischhackerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Rector-Phillips-Morse, Inc. v. VromanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.