Legal Opinion

United States v. Union Concrete Pipe Co.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 3, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action under the Renegotiation Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191, Renegotiation Act, § 403 to recover alleged excessive profits on war contracts. Two questions remaining in this case to be decided are (1) the amount of interest to be charged, and (2) the date from which interest should run.

This court has decided both of these questions under similar facts and circumstances. In a well considered opinion, this court, speaking through Judge Moore, decided that the rate of interest to be charged on the excessive profits should be six per cent, and that interest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greaves v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  2. United States v. Strontium Products Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Sportwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Ring Const. Corp. v. United States United States v. Ring Const. CorpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Ring Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
  4. United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API