Legal Opinion
United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
These are motions, (1) by the plaintiff for summary judgment in each of the four above-entitled actions, and (2) by the defendants for orders granting leave to serve amended and supplemental answers, consolidating all four actions, and staying the trial until final determination of an action brought against plaintiff in the United States Court of Claims by Empire Ordnance Corporation,. the parent of the defendants.
Each action was brought in October 1948, pursuant to Section 403(c) of the Renegotiation Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191(c), to recover a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Young v. GodbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Sampson Motors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Ring Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- Northwest Automatic Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- United States v. Wissahickon Tool Works, Inc. United States v. Roxboro Steel Co. United States v. Wilkes Barre Carriage Co., Inc. United States v. West Pittston Iron Works, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952