Ring Const. Corp. v. United States United States v. Ring Const. Corp
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
The United States of America and Robert P. Patterson, Secretary of War, brought this action as plaintiffs under the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191, 1 seeking to recover from Ring Construction Corporation as defendant excessive profits allegedly received by defendant on certain war contracts. Kenneth C. Royall, Secretary of the Army, was later substituted as party plaintiff in the place of Robert P. Patterson, Secretary of War. The final judgment of the District Court, 113 F. Supp. 217, awarded the government a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. United Drill & Tool Corp. United Drill & Tool Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Ring Constr. Corp. v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Ring Const. Corporation v. Secretary of War of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund Commission v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Eversharp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. E. F. Drew & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.