Commonwealth v. Deaner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
¶ 1 Appellant, Victor Nick Deaner, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it denied, without a hearing, his “Petition for Modification of Sentence Due to Illness.” We hold that the trial court properly denied Appellant’s petition where Appellant did not make a 'prima facie showing that his claim merited relief under 61 P.S. § 81. Accordingly, we affirm.
¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal are as follows. Appellant is a diabetic with an extensive medical history. Aside from the physical infirmities generally associated with diabetes, Appellant has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. LandiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. LuschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
3Cited by103 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ParteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MaskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. DemoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.