Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Deaner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 2001PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Victor Nick Deaner, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it denied, without a hearing, his “Petition for Modification of Sentence Due to Illness.” We hold that the trial court properly denied Appellant’s petition where Appellant did not make a 'prima facie showing that his claim merited relief under 61 P.S. § 81. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal are as follows. Appellant is a diabetic with an extensive medical history. Aside from the physical infirmities generally associated with diabetes, Appellant has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. LandiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. LuschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. ParteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MaskerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. DemoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API