Commonwealth v. Partee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
Raymond Douglas Partee appeals from the April 25, 2013 order treating his petition seeking enforcement of plea agreement as a PCRA petition and dismissing it as patently under Pa.R.Crim.P. 907. We agree with Appellant that the relief sought is not cognizable under the PCRA and that it was error to treat it as such. However, Appellant is not entitled to specific performance of a negotiated plea bargain that he subsequently breached. Hence, we affirm.
On September 17, 2007, Appellant entered a negotiated nolo contendere plea to indecent assault (person under age of thirteen),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JudgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DeanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrecoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Coppolino v. NoonanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. DemoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.