Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Masker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 2011PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.:

Appellant, Lester Masker, appeals from the order entered on September 18, 2009, by the Honorable Joseph F. Kameen, *842Court of Common Pleas of Pike County, that denied him relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act.1 After careful review, we affirm.

In Commonwealth v. Price, 876 A.2d 988 (Pa.Super.2005), a panel of this court held that classification as a sexually violent predator (“SVP”) under 42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 9792, independent of a challenge to a conviction or sentence, is not a cognizable claim under the PCRA. In contrast, we consider in this appeal whether a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HerediaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. ParteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. v. Blakeslee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Brady, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API