Commonwealth v. Masker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.:
Appellant, Lester Masker, appeals from the order entered on September 18, 2009, by the Honorable Joseph F. Kameen, *842Court of Common Pleas of Pike County, that denied him relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act.1 After careful review, we affirm.
In Commonwealth v. Price, 876 A.2d 988 (Pa.Super.2005), a panel of this court held that classification as a sexually violent predator (“SVP”) under 42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 9792, independent of a challenge to a conviction or sentence, is not a cognizable claim under the PCRA. In contrast, we consider in this appeal whether a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HeilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HerediaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ParteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BundySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Blakeslee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Brady, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.