Murrell v. North London Fine Art Co.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Hines, J.

We do not construe the judgment of the court as adjudging, that the plaintiffs do not have title to or a lien upon the liberty bond involved in this case. The provision in the order, *228that Samuel E. Murrell, Esq., “is directed to execute a proper assignment or order authorizing . . Lanford to take possession of said bond, and . . to deliver said bond to” the clerk of the court, is not to be construed as holding that plaintiffs have no title to or lien on this bond. The purpose of this provision is to enable Lanford to get this' bond from the United States…