(PC) Davis v. Allison
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARED DAVIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00494-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE1 13 v. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 14 K. ALLISON, et al., (Doc. No. 21) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s Second 18 Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 21, “SAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned 19 recommends that the district court dismiss the Second Amended Complaint because it fails to 20 state any cognizable…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.