Legal Opinion
Michael Willner v. James Dimon
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2017No. 15-1678PublishedCited by 491 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
Michael Willner (an attorney) and Marguerite Willner appeal the district court’s dismissal of their pro se complaint wherein they seek, inter alia, a declaration that JP Morgan Chase Bank (“Chase”) and U.S. Bank cannot foreclose on their home. The district court dismissed certain Counts for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and other Counts' for failure to state a claim. As we explain below, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over most of the Counts that the Willners…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by491 opinions
- Brennan v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Slade Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Kantsevoy v. Lumenr LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Balt. Scrap Corp. v. Exec. Risk Specialty Ins. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Courtney-Pope v. Bd. of Educ. of Carroll Cnty.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.