Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Russo

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 21, 2007No. 05 CR 1326 SCRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER.

ROBINSON, District Judge.

Defendants James Russo, Rita Russo, Elizabeth Russo, Rudolfo Russo, and Thomas Russo are charged with various counts of wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. These counts relate to an alleged scheme to defraud would be investors of a supposedly non-existent gold mine in Brazil, as well as schemes to defraud persons over the internet by operating a series of supposedly fraudulent businesses. Defendants filed various pre-trial motions for suppression of evidence, discovery, and bills of particulars. 1

A. Motion to Suppress Evidence

Pur…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pinto-ThomazDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. United States v. BarretDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  3. United States v. MandellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. United States v. ShayganDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  5. United States v. GomezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API