Legal Opinion

United States v. Pinto-Thomaz

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided December 6, 2018No. S2 18-CR-579 (JSR)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

The crime of insider trading is a straightforward concept that some courts have somehow managed to complicate. Essentially, insider trading is a variation of *296the species of fraud known as embezzlement, which is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as "[t]he fraudulent taking of personal property with which one has been entrusted, especially as a fiduciary." Black's Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014). In the case of insider trading, the property is a company's material confidential information that has value to the embezzler because of its potential use in the purchase and sale…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. District of Columbia v. WesbySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BlaszczakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. BlaszczakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Antonio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. Corley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Felix v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API