Legal Opinion
United States v. Gomez
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 2016No. 15 Cr. 348 (PGG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
PAUL G. GARDEPHE, United States District Judge
Defendants Jorge Gomez, Sandy Gomez, and Carolina Ramon-Baez are charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. (Dkt. No. 1) Sandy Gomez has moved to suppress all physical evidence recovered at the time of his December 7, 2014 arrest, as well as all statements obtained as a result of his allegedly unlawful arrest. (S. Gomez Notice of Motion (Dkt. No. 32) ¶¶ 1-2; see *733also S. Gomez Decl. (Dkt. No. 33) ¶ 1)…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Smith v. DeGirolamoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017