Hargrave v. Gardner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.
The demurrer was sustained below on the theory that the facts alleged by plaintiff affirmatively show that the purported cause of action has not accrued and will not accrue until there has been a final judicial determination that the paper writing is not the last will and testament of Lillian E. Grady, that is, that the cause of action “is solely predicated upon a contingency which has not happened.” The action was dismissed. This result, if sustained, leaves plaintiff entoiled in a procedural snarl which may ultimately defeat his claim, assuming the claim is meritorious and he is entitled to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Stegall v. Catawba Oil Company of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Floyd v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Hughes v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Johnson v. StevensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Patterson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Jones v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Cable v. HARDIN OIL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.