Jones v. Warren
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
The complaint contains the usual and essential allegations in an action of ejectment: that plaintiff owns the described land in fee; that he.is presently entitled to its possession; and that defendant who is in possession wrongfully withheld from- plaintiff to his specified damage. 1 McIntosh, N. C. Practice and Procedure § 1065 (2d Ed. 1956). Defendants concede that it states a cause of action in ejectment. Had defendants’ motion been a demurrer to the complaint it must necessarily have been overruled. G.S. 1-127; McIntosh, supra § 1194. It was not, however, a demurrer; it was, in fact, a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- German-American National Bank v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Tully v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.