Salmon v. Miller
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.
This action was commenced by decedent’s wife as personal representative, to recover those items of damage allowed under ORS 30.075. ① Decedent was injured while riding as a guest in defendant’s automobile. The amended complaint alleged gross negligence on the part of the defendant. A subsequent motion for leave to file amended pleadings, ■ through which plaintiff intended to add a count alleging simple negligence, was denied by the court at the close of the evidence. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff presents two arguments on appeal. First,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Duerst v. LimbockerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Bradfield v. KammerrerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duerst v. LimbockerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hill v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Kruse v. FitzpatrickOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Hill v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978