Legal Opinion

Hill v. Garner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1978No. 77-132Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ore. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

2DissentJustice White, joined by Justice Brennan

The issue presented by this appeal from the Oregon Supreme Court is whether Oregon’s guest-passenger statute, Ore. Rev. Stat. § 30.115 (1975), 1 violates either the Equal Protection or Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The statute, which prevents a nonpaying passenger from recovering against the owner or operator of a vehicle except in those situations in which the passenger’s injury is the result of an intentional or grossly negligent act on the part of the owner or operator, was upheld by the Oregon…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Jimenez v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API