Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Fitzpatrick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1977No. 35692, SC 24601PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered when she was struck by an automobile operated by defendant. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that defendant was negligent. Defendant’s answer alleged that plaintiff "was a guest in defendant’s vehicle within the meaning of ORS 30.115.” The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, finding as a matter of law that plaintiff was a guest within the meaning of ORS 30.115. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts are uncontested and reveal that plaintiff was struck while crossing her driveway in front of defendant’s stopped…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Duerst v. LimbockerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Head v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Hill v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hampton v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Youngquist v. FeaseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API