Legal Opinion

Bradfield v. Kammerrer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries suffered by her when she was struck by defendant’s automobile as she was crossing a street. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The accident occurred at approximately 7 p.m. on February 26, 1958. Plaintiff was crossing Hermiston Avenue in Hermiston, Oregon when she was struck. She was not in a crosswalk.

Plaintiff concedes that in violating the ordinance making it unlawful to cross a street between intersections she was contributorily negligent as a matter of law under the rule last announced by us…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Van Zandt v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hopfer v. StaudtOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Henthorne v. HopwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salmon v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API