Legal Opinion
Agnew v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2002No. 97-CF-1697PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Vanessa Agnew appeals her conviction of unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3815 (recodi-fied as D.C.Code § 22-3215 (2001)), contending that the government’s evidence was insufficient. 1 We hold that the evi dence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that use of the vehicle in question was unauthorized or that appellant knew that the vehicle was being used without the consent of the owner. .Thus, we reverse appellant’s conviction.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
Appellant and her codefendant, Marvin Wilson, were charged with one count of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Alphonso T. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Zacarias v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Brisbon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Floyd Long & Alonzo Ferrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re R.K.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.