Legal Opinion

Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 11, 1927No. 17237PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, O.

A civil action brought In the • district court of Tulsa county, Okla., February 21, 1924, by A. E. Little Company, a corporation, against Seidenbach’s, a corporation, and J. L. Seidenbach, defendants. This action was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury and a recovery was had by A. E. Little Company against Seidenbaeh’s, a corporation, and suit dismissed as to J. L. Seidenbach, individually, from which judgment an anneal was taken to this court for review. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they were designated in the court below.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bliven Mead v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Sinclair v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Welles v. ThorntonNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Balch v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Seidenbach's v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API