Balch v. Jones
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of the County of Colusa. Blanchard, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
This is an action to recover a mare and an undivided one half of five colte. The verdict was for the mare and one half of the colts, or, in case a return could not be had, for the value of all the property fixed at six hundred and twenty-five dollars. The judgment followed the verdict.
A tenant in common in a chattel can not maintain an action against his co-tenant for a recovery of the specific chattel or for his undivided moiety thereof, or interest therein. This would seem plain upon its statement; but see vol 1, Chitty’s Pleadings, Perkins’ Notes, 16th American edition, p.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buckley v. CarlisleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Schwartz v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Goldschmidt v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Perkins v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890