Legal Opinion

Balch v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1882No. 8,314PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of the County of Colusa. Blanchard, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

This is an action to recover a mare and an undivided one half of five colte. The verdict was for the mare and one half of the colts, or, in case a return could not be had, for the value of all the property fixed at six hundred and twenty-five dollars. The judgment followed the verdict.

A tenant in common in a chattel can not maintain an action against his co-tenant for a recovery of the specific chattel or for his undivided moiety thereof, or interest therein. This would seem plain upon its statement; but see vol 1, Chitty’s Pleadings, Perkins’ Notes, 16th American edition, p.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckley v. CarlisleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Schwartz v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Goldschmidt v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Perkins v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API