Sinclair v. Murphy
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent Circuit. The facts are stated in the opinion. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $2003.58.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley J.
From the record it appears that Murphy sought to recover against Sinclair, in the Court below, for certain moneys which the latter had received from him and failed to dispose of *395according to the understanding between them. It appeared that the plaintiff (below) and Samuel Sinclair, a brother of the defendant, had been in partnership as sutlers to the fourteenth regiment of Michigan Infantry, of which the defendant was Colonel; that in April, 1862, when the regiment was in Tennessee, Samuel Sinclair left for Ms home in Michigan, and did not afterwards return, and the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swart v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Pulliam v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Goebel v. StevensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.