Legal Opinion

Knight Soda Fountain Co. v. Dirnberger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1934No. 29,862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial after verdict for defendant.

The action was in replevin, the plaintiff alleging that it was the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of a soda fountain and attachments, including an electric carbonator, and that defendant retains possession thereof after demand. The answer alleges that defendant bought the property of plaintiff and that title thereto is in defendant, denies the other allegations of the complaint, and prays judgment- that plaintiff take nothing. Defendant re-bonded and retained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. M & M Securities Co. v. DirnbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. W. W. Kimball Co. v. MasseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Murphy v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herbst v. SuilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. First Church of Christ, Scientist v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API