W. W. Kimball Co. v. Massey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Wright county to recover a piano nr $250, the value thereof. The case was tried before Giddings, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $116 in favor of defendant. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff replevied a piano which defendant had agreed to buy. Defendant did not ask for a return, but counterclaimed to recover back the instalments paid on the ground that the piano was not as warranted. Another counterclaim was also pleaded, but need not be mentioned since no evidence was received thereon. The defendant *462recovered what had been paid. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. . • . " ,
No motion for a new trial appears to have been made, hence no-error assigned upon the charge of the court can be considered. Neither is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goebel v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ChesrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Potter v. EastonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Aultman Co. v. McDonoughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. v. ForthunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Independent Harvester Co. v. MalzohnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Blue Earth Valley Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.