Herbst v. Suilman

Magney, Commissioner.

In automobile collision cases, judgments were entered against plaintiffs, and they appeal.

Sufficiency of the evidence is not involved. The main contentions relate to the court’s instructions to the jury.

At the close of the court’s charge, no objections or exceptions were noted as to any matter contained therein and now set out in the motions for a new trial and in the assignments of error to this court.

In the motions for new trial, the only claimed error alleged in connection with the charge reads as follows:

“Errors of law occurring at the trial, and objected to at the…