Legal Opinion
Hemily v. Hemily
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1979No. 13379PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Associate Judge:
This case arises from a divorce proceeding. Appellant-wife contends (1) that the trial court erred in treating certain of appellant’s individually-owned property as part of the total marital property which could be distributed by the court under D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § 16-910(b), and (2) that the trial court abused its discretion in the manner in which it distributed the couple’s property. We affirm.
I
In 1958 the Hemilys purchased two virtually identical houses, located at 3120 and 3122 Dumbarton Street, N.W., as tenants by the entirety. The down payments for the houses…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Turpin v. TurpinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Reilly v. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hackes v. HackesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Turpin v. TurpinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Barbour v. BarbourDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Murville v. MurvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.