Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Barbour

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1983No. 82-138PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

The principal issue we consider on this appeal is a question of first impression in this jurisdiction: whether Civil Service pension benefits may constitute marital property subject to equitable distribution under D.C.Code § 16 — 910(b) (1981). The trial court answered this question in the affirmative and awarded appellee 50% of that portion of appellant’s pension benefits attributable to his earnings during the couple’s marriage. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in so ruling, or, alternatively, that if pensions may be deemed marital property,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Kuchta v. KuchtaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Kruger v. KrugerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. Robert C. S. v. Barbara J. S.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Webster v. Hope (In Re Hope)District Court, District of Columbia · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API