Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Reilly

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 24, 1950No. 10332PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Consideration of this appeal leads to the following conclusions:

The evidence was sufficient to support the granting of a limited divorce for cruelty in favor of appellee.

The court had jurisdiction under its general equity powers to adjudicate and settle a dispute between the parties concerning their respective rights in funds and property which had been acquired by them during marriage, or incident thereto. 11 D. C.Code (1940) § 325; Baxt v. Baxt, 1946, 320 Mass. 762, 70 N.E.2d 799; Novick v. Novick, 1937, 299 Mass. 15, 11 N.E.2d 481; Gibbons v. Gibbons, 1936, 296 Mass. 89, 4 N.E.2d 1019.

Title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. GibbonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. MacLennan v. MacLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Novick v. NovickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Hitchcock v. HitchcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Cohagan v. CohaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Hemily v. HemilyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Holcomb v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API