Reilly v. Reilly
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Consideration of this appeal leads to the following conclusions:
The evidence was sufficient to support the granting of a limited divorce for cruelty in favor of appellee.
The court had jurisdiction under its general equity powers to adjudicate and settle a dispute between the parties concerning their respective rights in funds and property which had been acquired by them during marriage, or incident thereto. 11 D. C.Code (1940) § 325; Baxt v. Baxt, 1946, 320 Mass. 762, 70 N.E.2d 799; Novick v. Novick, 1937, 299 Mass. 15, 11 N.E.2d 481; Gibbons v. Gibbons, 1936, 296 Mass. 89, 4 N.E.2d 1019.
Title…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbons v. GibbonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- MacLennan v. MacLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Novick v. NovickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Hitchcock v. HitchcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Cohagan v. CohaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. SeboldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Hemily v. HemilyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holcomb v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.