Legal Opinion

Schow v. Guardtone, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1966No. 10546PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiffs, Russell and Doris Schow, sued defendants, Guardtone, Inc., et al., to have certain contracts relating to the purchase of an intercommunication and fire alarm system for their home declared void for fraud. On special interrogatories a jury found the issue in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court gave judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiffs appeal.

In September 1962, the plaintiffs entered into the contracts with Albert J. Hughes, an agent for Guardtone of Utah and Guardtone, Inc. of Nevada, to purchase the intercom and fire alarm system which was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Andreasen v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lundstrom v. Radio Corporation of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lewis v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. PRICE'S CREAMERIES, DIV., ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Basden v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Mel Hardman Productions, Inc. v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gustaveson v. GreggUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Winters v. WS HATCH COMPANY, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API