Legal Opinion

Holland v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1964No. 10011PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This suit was instituted to enforce a written contract to purchase cookware for $279.-SÓ, and for attorneys’ fees. Upon issue joined and trial to a jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. But it awarded him only nominal damages of $1.00 and $75.00 attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to a motion, the district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict (n. o. v.), increasing the award of damages to $100.00.

Defendant appeals, contending: that as a matter of law there was no binding contract; that even if there was, plaintiff is entitled only to the nominal damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Page v. Federal Security Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hawkins v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Stewart v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Miller v. Denver Post, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jenkins v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Flying J Inc. v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API