Holland v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
This suit was instituted to enforce a written contract to purchase cookware for $279.-SÓ, and for attorneys’ fees. Upon issue joined and trial to a jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. But it awarded him only nominal damages of $1.00 and $75.00 attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to a motion, the district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict (n. o. v.), increasing the award of damages to $100.00.
Defendant appeals, contending: that as a matter of law there was no binding contract; that even if there was, plaintiff is entitled only to the nominal damages…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Page v. Federal Security Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Hawkins v. PerryUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- Stewart v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Miller v. Denver Post, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Malone v. Courtyard by Marriott Ltd. PartnershipOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Jenkins v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Flying J Inc. v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.