Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McFarland

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1989No. 2431PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence. The appeal was submitted to this court without oral argument. In his brief on appeal appellant Peter J. McFarland’s attorney simply recounts the history of the case and a summary of the facts leading up to McFarland’s arrest. This is followed by a statement that after a thorough review of the record, counsel concluded that an appeal would be wholly frivolous and without arguable merit, citing Commonwealth v. McGeth, 347 Pa.Super. 333, 500 A.2d 860 (1985) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. McGethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarangSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. BurwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API