Legal Opinion

Lavell Frierson v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of the California State Prison at San Quentin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2006No. 04-99002PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge.

Lavell Frierson appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habe-as corpus petition challenging a California jury’s special circumstances findings and death penalty. verdict for his convictions for assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, *984kidnaping for the purposes of robbery, and first degree felony murder. In this opinion, we conclude that trial counsel failed to investigate and present important mitigation evidence at the penalty phase of the third trial. Had counsel’s investigation been adequate, the sentencing jury could have heard evidence that Frierson…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Crittenden v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Joe Leonard Lambright v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Duncan v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Stanley v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API