Joe Leonard Lambright v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by
Judge FERGUSON.
ORDER
The per curiam opinion filed May 11, 2007 is hereby amended as follows:
1. At 485 F.3d at 516, line 15 of the slip opinion, the word “few” is changed to “number of.”
2. At 485 F.3d at 527, line 34 of the slip opinion, the word “few” is changed to “number of.”
With these amendments, Judges Ferguson, Reinhardt, and Thompson vote to deny the petition for rehearing.
Judge Reinhardt votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc; Judges Ferguson and Thompson so recommend. The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. No…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Davis v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robinson v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- David Ramirez v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Rhoades v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Duncan v. OrnoskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.