Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
This was an action of trespass on the case brought to recover damages for the death of the intestate, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant.
To properly understand the questions raised a brief reference to the facts will be necessary.
The Saginaw Company and the Stephenson Company were the owners of adjoining tracts of land upon which there was a vein of iron ore. These companies commenced mining upon their respective lands, and near to the division line, the defendant opening its mine within a very few feet of the line. These mines, at the time of the injury complained of, were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- St. Peter v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- People v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- New Bedford Five Cents Savings Bank v. Union Mill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
3Cited by48 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- MacDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Alpern v. ChurchillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.