Alpern v. Churchill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. (Emeriek, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
Action on the case for a negligent injury hy fire, alleged to have been communicated from defendants’ premises.
It seems that in 1877 defendants, being the owners and in *608possession of certain premises in the city of Alpena, and operating a steam saw-mill thereon, for the purpose of consuming the refuse matter arising from^the manufacture of lumber, such as slabs, saw-dust, &c., erected upon such premises a refuse burner, so called. Its general dimensions and description seem to be as follows: The base is cylindrical in form, and twenty-two feet in diameter inside. This diameter continues up…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Macomber v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Higgins v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Field v. . N.Y.C.R.R.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Schoepper v. Hancock Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Schedlbauer v. Chris-Craft Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Gadde v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.