Legal Opinion
Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 23, 2002No. 01-1648PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. (“DAHI”), seeks review of the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas dismissing the case in its entirety. The district court held that the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant-appellee, the University of Toronto Innovations Foundation (“UTIF”), would violate due process. Consequently, the district court granted UTIF’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to dismiss pending binding arbitration. For .the reasons explained below, we…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet LabsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Abbyy Software HouseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Silent Drive, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc. And Brooks StrongCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Synthes v. G.M. Dos Reis Jr. Ind. Com. De Equip. MedicoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rivka Livnat v. Palestinian AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.