Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murphy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 6, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At issue is who should pay the attorney’s fees determined and approved pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (d), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996). A Superior Court judge allowed the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, and the prosecutor (the district attorney for Hampden) applied to a single justice of this court for leave to appeal. Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (a) (2), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996). The application was denied.1 The defendant then moved for determination and approval of attorney’s fees pursuant to rule 15 (d). The single justice allowed the motion and ordered that “15…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilday v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. DuniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Bromfield v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Latimore v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API