Bromfield v. Treasurer & Receiver General
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
This is an action in the nature of mandamus pursuant to G. L. c. 79, § 10A. The case is before us following a reservation and report by a single justice of this court on March 2, 1983. Mass. R. Civ. P. 64, 365 Mass. 831 (1974). The principal issue for our determination is whether an order directed to the Treasurer and Receiver General of the Commonwealth (Treasurer) should issue to compel payment of a judgment and execution rendered in an eminent domain action, where the initial appropriation authorizing the taking has been exhausted, and where the Legislature has made no new appropriation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Reeside v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Perez v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bromfield v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Verrochi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Alliance, AFSCME/SEIU, AFL-CIO v. Secretary of AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.