Legal Opinion

Gilday v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 27, 1971PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, J.

The petitioners (hereinafter called the defendants) await trial on indictments for murder and armed robbery. Their petitions in the county court under G. L. c. 211, § 3, as amended, were reserved and reported, without decision, to the full court. The defendants seek to vacate orders of a Superior Court judge, entered upon motions of the Commonwealth, that each defendant prior to trial disclose whether he intends to interpose (1) a defence of not guilty by reason of insanity, or (2) a defence of alibi, and if so, the names, addresses, and dates of birth of witnesses he intends to produce in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. StumpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. State v. DoddArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lamar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Commonwealth v. VecchiolliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Operation RescueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Myers v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Blaisdell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. Lam Hue ToMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API