Legal Opinion
Menna v. Jaiman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 4, 2003No. AC 23804PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCH ABLER, J.
In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Lenora Menna, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in her favor after a jury trial in which the jury awarded her $50 in nominal damages as against the defendant, Julio T. Jaiman. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) granted the defendant’s motion in limine to preclude expert testimony, (2) placed the burden on her to show an absence of prejudice due to her failure to disclose expert witnesses and (3) refused to allow her to cross-*133examine certain witnesses. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Sullivan v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Barksdale v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Lane v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Cavallaro v. Hospital of Saint RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Wexler v. DeMaioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Vitone v. Waterbury HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. ArringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.