Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Warren

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2007No. Docket 266426PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, EJ.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. We affirm.

This is not the first time this matter has been before this Court. In a prior appeal, this Court set forth the background facts:

In the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, the City of Warren planted silver maple trees on public easements between the sidewalk and street curb in front of residents’ homes. In 1967, the city prohibited further planting of silver maples because they grow quickly and should have been planted away from structures and streets to avoid interference with sewers…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rafferty v. MarkovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Zine v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. BlevinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Chelsea Investment Group LLC v. City of ChelseaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Augustine v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Yoost v. CaspariMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Duncan v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API