Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country Club
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant Washtenaw Country Club declined to renew plaintiffs contract as the club’s golf professional, following plaintiff’s apparently notorious and public separation from his wife and cohabitation with another woman. The trial court summarily dismissed plaintiff’s breach of contract and marital discrimination claims. The Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of the contract claim, but held that, under our decision in McCready v Hoffius, 459 Mich 131; 586 NW2d 723 (1998) (McCready II), vacated in part 459 Mich 1235 (1999), discrimination on the basis of “unmarried cohabitation” violated the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Joseph v. Auto Club Insurance AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Peña v. Ingham County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.