Blackstone Consulting, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. At issue is the interpretation of a settlement agreement between the parties and whether the government has breached that agreement. The plaintiff, Blackstone Consulting, Inc. (the “plaintiff’), argues that the parties agreed that the defendant, the United States (“government” or “defendant”), would provide the plaintiff with a directed subcontract for two years and that the government has breached this agreement. The government argues that the parties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Federal Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Jemal's Lazriv Water, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- In re Nortel Networks, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015