Legal Opinion

Caron v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 29, 1996No. 6-94-16; CA A85982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating four prison disciplinary rules: destruction of property, OAR 291-105-015(l)(b); possession of a dangerous/deadly weapon or escape device, OAR 291-105-015(4)(i); unauthorized possession of property, OAR 291-105-015(l)(g); and escape, OAR 291-105-015(4)(g). He petitions for review.1 We reverse and remand.

The charges arose from a plot to escape from the penitentiary by sawing through window bars of the culinary department’s butcher shop. The plan was revealed to a corrections officer by Taylor, one of the inmates planning the escape. Taylor implicated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Bishop v. OREGON STATE PEN., COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Abraham Cruz v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Cruz v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Caron v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API