Caron v. Oregon State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating four prison disciplinary rules: destruction of property, OAR 291-105-015(l)(b); possession of a dangerous/deadly weapon or escape device, OAR 291-105-015(4)(i); unauthorized possession of property, OAR 291-105-015(l)(g); and escape, OAR 291-105-015(4)(g). He petitions for review.1 We reverse and remand.
The charges arose from a plot to escape from the penitentiary by sawing through window bars of the culinary department’s butcher shop. The plan was revealed to a corrections officer by Taylor, one of the inmates planning the escape. Taylor implicated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Bishop v. OREGON STATE PEN., COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Abraham Cruz v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Cruz v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramirez v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Caron v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996