Legal Opinion

Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 23, 1974No. 3336, 03-74-023PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

Petitioner was found guilty by a prison disciplinary committee of assaulting another inmate. On appeal petitioner raises four issues: (1) whether he was entitled, under the prison’s procedural rules, to the assistance of counsel; (2) whether he was entitled, under the constitution and procedural rules, to present additional evidence before the disciplinary committee; (3) whether the committee violated the procedural rules governing informant’s reports; and (4) whether all factors germane to the sanction imposed were properly considered.

It is now established that prisoners do not have the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bonney v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Cor. Div.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Moore v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Dragoo v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Gilmore v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Bishop v. OREGON STATE PEN., COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Carpenter v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Liston v. Oregon Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API