Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Petitioner was found guilty by a prison disciplinary committee of assaulting another inmate. On appeal petitioner raises four issues: (1) whether he was entitled, under the prison’s procedural rules, to the assistance of counsel; (2) whether he was entitled, under the constitution and procedural rules, to present additional evidence before the disciplinary committee; (3) whether the committee violated the procedural rules governing informant’s reports; and (4) whether all factors germane to the sanction imposed were properly considered.
It is now established that prisoners do not have the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bonney v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Cor. Div.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Moore v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Dragoo v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Gilmore v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandlin v. Oregon Women's Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Bishop v. OREGON STATE PEN., COR. DIV.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Allen v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Carpenter v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Liston v. Oregon Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.