Legal Opinion
Kairy v. Supershuttle International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 22, 2009No. C 08-02993 JSWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS CALIFORNIA CAUSES OF ACTION AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN NECESSARY PARTIES
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Now before the Court are two motions filed by Defendants SuperShuttle Interna tional, Inc. and SuperShuttle Franchise Corporation (collectively “SuperShuttle”). The first is a motion to dismiss all claims based on California law, specifically the second through eleventh claims, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). The second is a motion to dismiss and/or for other relief for failure to join necessary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kairy v. SuperShuttle InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011