Sadloski v. Town of Manchester
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction to determine the merits of a taxpayer action without first deciding whether the taxpayer has standing to pursue such a claim. A number of taxpayers1 of the town of Manchester brought this action challenging the enforceability of a tax assessment agreement between the named defendant, the town of Manchester, and the defendant The Mall at Buckland Hills Partnership. The *81defendant Homart Manchester Investment Company is an investor in The Mall at Buckland Hills Partnership. The plaintiffs alleged that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Unisys Corp. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Sadloski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- In Re Allison G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.